
LEANWARE TEAM
1 x Senior Full Stack Developer, 3 x Mid Full Stack Developers, 1 x Product Designer
CLIENT OVERVIEW
Groundlight is an innovative application that leverages Machine Learning Models and Computer Vision algorithms to analyze images. They approached Leanware in search of a reliable partner to enhance their product capabilities and transition into the SaaS phase.
Groundlight's technology enables users to ask questions about an image in a video stream (computer vision), for instance, inquiring about the status of doors, whether they are open or closed, or looking about safety measures in industries by analyzing the use of safety helmets. It has widespread applicability across various domains and use cases,
With Leanware as their partner, Groundlight successfully improved its product, gaining traction by enhancing features and functionality in its Computer Vision product.
This partnership resulted in acquiring new users, creating a more user-friendly interface, streamlining business processes, and an overall improvement in the application's performance and reliability.

Python, React.js, Amazon Web Services, Kubernetes, Django, Github Actions
Tech Stack Involved

Our software development team's contributions to Groundlight included:
Human Intervention Integration:
When the algorithm fails to provide correct answers, we implemented a system for human intervention and disagreements. This feedback is used to train and refine the machine learning model, enhancing its future performance.
User Interface and Experience Improvements:
Significant efforts were made to improve the platform's UI and UX, making it more intuitive and user-friendly for clients in the manufacturing sector.
Feature Implementation:
Implementation of features like signups, designing bounding boxes on images, and account metrics usage by user, adding to the functionality and usability of the application.
Overall Code Enhancement:
We focused on refining and optimizing the overall code base to ensure better performance, scalability, and maintainability of the application.
SERVICES PROVIDED

UX & UI DESIGN
.webp)


Tailored components, crafted with detailed precision.
The file structure is organized by features and sprint/Client priority.

Before Our Intervention:
Groundlight's initial MVP needed enhancements in various areas, including accuracy, user interaction, and interface design.
After Implementing Leanware:
Improved Algorithm Accuracy: The Computer Vision algorithm became more accurate and reliable in image analysis and responding to safety-related queries.
Enhanced User Experience: The improvements in UI and UX made the platform more accessible and easier to use for manufacturing industry personnel.
Effective Human-AI Collaboration: The integration of human intervention in the learning loop of the ML model greatly improved its accuracy and adaptability.
Streamlined Business Processes: The development of business flows and additional features like bounding box design and user metrics enhanced the overall functionality of the platform.
Safer Manufacturing Environments: The application now effectively aids in monitoring safety compliance, contributing to safer working conditions on the shop floor.
Through these developments, Groundlight has transformed into a more efficient, user-friendly, and accurate tool for ensuring safety compliance in the manufacturing industry.
From Blueprint to Delivery
RESULTS

FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
What's the minimum viable product for factory safety monitoring?
An effective MVP is: a focused risk zone instrumented with 2–6 cameras, a validated PPE detector for the target classes, edge inference for real-time alerts, a simple alerting channel (SMS/email/Slack) and a logging dashboard for review. It must include a labeling loop and process for rapid retraining. Keep scope tight: one line or risk type, measurable acceptance criteria, and a rollout plan.
How to evaluate if a development company can handle manufacturing compliance and safety-critical systems?
Ask for case studies and references in industrial or regulated environments, request architecture diagrams showing security and failover, verify certifications (ISO 27001, functional safety if relevant), review their testing and validation process (stress, edge cases, adversarial tests), and request a small technical pilot or code sample. Confirm they understand relevant safety standards (OSHA, industry-specific rules) and can produce traceable test evidence.
What's the ongoing cost to run computer vision monitoring for a 50,000 sq ft facility?
Ongoing costs include edge/cloud compute, storage, networking, model maintenance, and support. Rough estimate: $3k–$20k/month depending on processing approach (edge-heavy is cheaper cloud costs), retention policy (video storage is expensive), and SLA/managed-service level. Budget for periodic model retraining and 10–20% of initial project cost per year for maintenance.
What happens when the computer vision system fails? Backup procedures needed?
Design for failure: implement graceful degradation (fallback to simpler heuristics or alerts), human-in-the-loop escalation, redundant edge nodes, and health-checks with heartbeat monitoring. Define SOPs for supervisors when the system is offline (manual observation, increased signage), and have on-call support and an incident playbook. Keep a local buffer (ring buffer) so recent footage is available for postmortem when systems recover.
How to handle union and worker privacy concerns with video monitoring?
Start with transparency and policies: communicate goals (safety, not productivity surveillance), define strict access controls, anonymize/blur faces in analytics outputs, store minimal metadata, and limit retention. Engage unions and legal/HR early, show mockups and privacy impact assessments, and offer opt-in pilots or union representatives visibility into results. Clear governance and documented purpose are essential.
How do I integrate computer vision with existing manufacturing execution systems (MES)?
Use event-driven integration: publish alerts/events via MQTT, Kafka, webhooks, or REST to the MES/ERP. Map CV events to MES alarm types and ensure timestamps/IDs align. Work with the MES team to define workflows for automated responses (stop line, notify supervisor, log incident). Standard industrial protocols (OPC-UA) may be needed for SCADA/PLC integration.
Should I build custom computer vision or use existing APIs for manufacturing safety?
If your use case is standard (hard hat, vest), off-the-shelf models/APIs can accelerate pilots. For factory-specific needs (special PPE, unique angles, integration, compliance), custom models are usually required to reach acceptable accuracy and explainability. A hybrid approach — start with prebuilt models, then fine-tune with your labeled data — is common and efficient.
Can computer vision work in challenging factory conditions (dust, lighting, steam)?
Yes, but success requires engineering: choose appropriate cameras (higher dynamic range, IR), use protective housings, place cameras to minimize direct steam/dust paths, apply preprocessing (contrast/denoising), and collect training data with those conditions. Sometimes combining sensors (thermal, proximity) with vision improves reliability.
How many training images are needed for reliable PPE detection?
Minimum viable models can be trained with a few thousand labelled instances per class (hard hat on/off, vest on/off) if the images are diverse. For robust, generalizable systems across different lines and lighting, aim for 5k–20k+ labeled images per class including edge cases, plus synthetic augmentation and video-frame sampling.
How accurate can computer vision be for PPE detection in real factory conditions?
In controlled conditions, PPE detectors (hard hat, high-vis vest) commonly hit 95%+ precision/recall. In real factory conditions—occlusion, poor lighting, dust, covered helmets—expect 85–95% after careful data collection and augmentation. Accuracy improves with more diverse training data, proper camera placement, and periodic retraining.
How many cameras are needed to monitor a typical manufacturing floor?
There’s no single answer — it depends on coverage density, line layout, occlusions, and task. A typical 50,000 sq ft facility may need dozens to low hundreds of cameras to cover multiple lines and blind spots. Start mapping critical risk zones first: entry/exit points, high-hazard machines, material transfer areas, and then pilot camera density for one line to learn exact counts.
What hardware (cameras, edge devices) is needed for factory floor computer vision?
Industrial PoE cameras with IR/low-light capability, rugged housing, appropriate lenses (wide or narrow depending on coverage) and fixed mounts. Edge inference appliances like NVIDIA Jetson family, Intel NCS2, or small form-factor servers for on-prem inference; optional NVRs for archival. Choose cameras and edges rated for temperature/dust/EMI appropriate to your environment.
What team composition do I need for a computer vision project in manufacturing?
Core team for delivery and ops: ML engineer (model training & evaluation), CV/data engineer (labeling pipelines, augmentation), software/backend engineer (APIs, integrations), edge/embedded engineer (hardware, inference), DevOps/SRE (deployment, monitoring), QA/test engineer, product manager/project manager, and a domain SME (safety manager/industrial engineer). For pilots, roles can be combined (3–6 people); production needs a dedicated team or vendor.
How long does it take to develop an MVP for industrial computer vision monitoring?
A pragmatic MVP can be delivered in 6–12 weeks if requirements and access to the floor (video, annotations) are ready. That covers camera placement, a basic model (hard hat/high-vis detection), edge proof-of-concept, and alerting. More complex rules, custom models, or strict compliance may extend timelines to 3–6 months.
What's the typical cost to build a computer-vision safety monitoring system for manufacturing?
Ballpark depends on scope. A lightweight pilot/MVP (single line, a few cameras, basic PPE/zone breach detection) typically runs $50k–$200k including hardware, software development, initial model training, and deployment. A full plant rollout with custom models, integration to MES/ERP, industrial hardware, redundancy, and regulatory work commonly runs $250k–$1M+. Ongoing ops, cloud/edge hosting, maintenance and model updates are extra (see ongoing cost answer).
An effective MVP is: a focused risk zone instrumented with 2–6 cameras, a validated PPE detector for the target classes, edge inference for real-time alerts, a simple alerting channel (SMS/email/Slack) and a logging dashboard for review. It must include a labeling loop and process for rapid retraining. Keep scope tight: one line or risk type, measurable acceptance criteria, and a rollout plan.
MVP development typically requires a few months. Complex migrations take longer. Timeline depends on scope, integration complexity, and data migration requirements.
Yes, we accommodate various engagement lengths for dedicated developers. Project-based work handles shorter timelines for specific deliverables like migrations or performance optimization.
All code undergoes peer review, includes comprehensive tests, follows TypeScript strict mode, and meets ESLint standards. We implement CI/CD pipelines with automated testing before production deployment.
Yes, we regularly join ongoing projects. Initial assessment reviews architecture, identifies technical debt, and establishes development standards before beginning feature work.
We work with current Supabase platform including latest PostgreSQL versions, Edge Functions, Realtime, Storage API, and Auth. We stay current with platform evolution and beta features.
Daily async updates via Slack, weekly video calls for sprint planning, bi-weekly demos showing progress. Full code visibility through GitHub with detailed pull request documentation.
Yes, we execute NDAs before discovery phase. All code and intellectual property belongs to you. We maintain strict confidentiality and security protocols for proprietary systems.
We love to take on new challenges, tell us yours.
We'll get back to you in 1 day business tops

